Cases 51 - 60 of 1,822
Silva v. State of New York et al
as 9:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Santo Carrero Silva
Defendant:
State of New York and Mark Duane Lentini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. BRANCH et al
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
Throneberry v. Nunn
as 23-6165
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL DUANE THRONEBERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, Warden
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Holmes, III et al
as 2:2023cv05321
Plaintiff:
Damien Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
William Harrison Holmes, III and Duane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De'Adrian Boykins v. Sheri Wilson, et al
as 23-3027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE'ADRIAN C. BOYKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERI WILSON, MARTIAL KNIESER and DUAN PIERCE, Doctor
Duane Adams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13455
Petitioner / Appellant:
DUANE E. ADAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ramone Robinson v. Duane Henry, et al
as 23-13449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMONE DAYNE ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DUANE HENRY, Assistant State Attorney, KADEAN WILSON, Assistant State Attorney, TREVOR PERSENAIRE, Assistant State Attorney and others
Bobby Cockerell, III v. Mike Conyers, et al
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY B. COCKERELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE CONYERS, Major, JERRY GILLEY, Capt, CURTIS BYNUM, Lieutenant, Lt and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
