Cases 51 - 60 of 153
Bussie v. BOP Secretary et al
as 5:2019hc02116
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and BOP Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McBride et al v. Ya'cup et al
as 1:2019cv02404
Defendant:
John P. Lonergan, James E. Shadid, Brian L. Bernston and others
Plaintiff:
Englewood Tp. Corp. and Dytaniel L. McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv02382
Plaintiff:
William Evans
Defendant:
Asa J Bucci, Eric B White, City of Chicago, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER MATHIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02702
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00834
Defendant:
W. Clemmons, L.W. Harrell, S. Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowlin v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018ct03078
Plaintiff:
Hassie Demond Nowlin
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Guilford County, B.J. Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hackle v. Prince et al
as 4:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hackle
Defendant:
Prince, J.P. Ziesmer and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussie v. J-Pay et al
as 5:2018hc02006
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
J-Pay, Keefe, EZ Card and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BATTLE v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2017cv12041
Plaintiff:
J.P. BATTLE
Defendant:
MCGANN, PETER A. SARKOS and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.