Cases 51 - 60 of 799
Marquis Bellamy v. USA
as 23-12838
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARQUIS SHAROD BELLAMY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust et al. v. State of Ohio
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust and Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Devers v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00731
Petitioner:
Marquis Deron Devers
Respondent:
FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RESHAD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JUSTIN BAILEY and GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunskill v. Booth et al
as 3:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
Dylan Richey Brunskill
Defendant:
Marquis Booth, Santa Cruz Sheriff's Department and Booking Staff for Santa Cruz Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv02662
Plaintiff:
Diandre Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Bennett and William Weier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03357
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Marquis Copez
Defendant:
Ofc. George Wilson, Lt. Sean MacKenzie and Lt. Brandon Caple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Haine et al
as 3:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
Diandre Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas A. Haine, Morgan Hudson and Phil Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
