Cases 51 - 60 of 297
MAFFETT v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
OFFICER NALLEY, SGT. SMITH, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Larson et al
as 2:2012cv02296
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sutton
Defendant:
. Larson, Gary Gerst, . Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chesser v. Walton et al
as 3:2012cv01198
Plaintiff:
Zachary Chesser
Defendant:
J. S. Walton, Wendy J Roal, Jeffrey Baney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Silverstein v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SILVERSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN VANYUR, JOYCE CONLEY and others
Al-Amin v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv03872
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkabile, M. Munson, Blake Davis and others
Hassan Nalley v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 12-3338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HASSAN NALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Al-Amin v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkabile, M. Munson, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv01219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT, CRAIG APKER, RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joaquin Foy v. Juan Castillo, et al
as 12-2235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joaquin Irwin Foy, also known as Abdul Hakiym Muhammad, also known as Ali-Foy
Defendant - Appellee:
Juan Castillo, Warden, In Personal and Official Capacity, Psyche Staff of Certain Doctors, In Personal and Official Capacity, Certain Correctional Officers of Mental Health, In Personal and Official Capacity and others
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 12-1172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY and RON WILEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
