Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Martin v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant:
T. Bobbitt, S. Jackson, Freddie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hoye v. I.T. Gilmore
as 16-7084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
I. T. GILMORE, Warden Coffeewood Correctional Center, S. HILL, Assistant Warden- Coffeewood Correctional Center, R. MARTIN, EBP-Reentry Mgr. Coffeewood Correctional Center and others
Charles Hoye v. I.T. Gilmore
as 16-7040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
I. T. GILMORE, Warden Coffeewood Correctional Center, S. HILL, Assistant Warden- Coffeewood Correctional Center, R. MARTIN, EBP-Reentry Mgr. Coffeewood Correctional Center and others
Hinton v. Goewey et al
as 1:2016cv05231
Plaintiff:
William L Hinton
Defendant:
Edward Goewey, Brett Bartunek, Michael Janovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominique Brock v. Harlan Martin, et al
as 16-5236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINIQUE J. BROCK, aka Americo J. Brock, aka Dominique J. Brock-Butler
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. HARLAN R. MARTIN, COREY J. KINDRED, C/O, WILLIAM LONG, C/O and others
Martin v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Defendant:
D. Paramo , F. Armenta, S. Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Roosevelt Smith, Elizabeth Buckley, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Martin v. William Pollard
as 16-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM POLLARD
Clegg v. K. Bishop
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Clegg, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Bishop and R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Smith et al
as 6:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kendrick R. Martin
Defendant:
Tarmarshe Smith and Madia C. West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
