Cases 51 - 60 of 181
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 17-13387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, JAMES MCMILLAN, Unit Manager, ROBERT JONES, General Counsel and others
Henry Lagmay v. Shelley Nobriga, et al
as 17-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLEY NOBRIGA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, FRANCIS SEQUEIRA and others
Jones v. Muniz et al
as 3:2017cv02037
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
W. Muniz, J. Lewis, K. Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Jones et al
as 5:2017ct03090
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kevin Mullen, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Jones, Marcus Sharpe and Medical Staff Tylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Robert Jones, et al
as 17-10695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY WARDEN, ROBERT JONES, General Counsel and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN YOUNG, LAW LIBRARIAN
Jones v. Smith
as 1:2016cv06470
Petitioner:
Robert Jones
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Willyard v. Thomas Lee, et al
as 16-3964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phillip L. Willyard
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Lee, Judge Advocate, Mark Berry, Adjutant General, Arkansas National Guard, James Bas, Director, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07439
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 16-16379
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Robert Jones v. USA
as 16-3772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
