Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Terry Smith v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 10-30173
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Smith v. State of Washington
as 2:2009cv01455
Petitioner:
Terry Smith
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 6:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett #200640 v. Jondreau et al
as 2:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
William Jondreau, Terri Smith, J. Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #317017 v. Marined et al
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Irmon C. Williams #317017
Defendant:
Michael Marined, Randy McClellan, Unknown Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood #299554 v. Smith
as 2:2009cv00026
Petitioner:
Mark David Wood #299554
Respondent:
Terri Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee-Bryant #337291 v. Perttu et al
as 2:2008cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lavere Lee-Bryant #337291
Defendant:
Thomas Perttu, Richard Stapleton, James Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Bey v. Tim Luoma, et al
as 08-2318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM LUOMA, DARLENE EDLUND, WILLIAM JONDREAU and others
David Wayne v. John Perry, et al
as 08-1949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN WAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PERRY, Resident Unit Officer, In his official and individual capacity, KEITH ERKKILA, Resident Unit Officer, In his official and individual capacity (named "Keith Erkilla" on the Complaint), GREG MCQUIGGIN, Warden (named "G. McQuiggen" on Complaint) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
