Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Gonzales-Abrahantes v. Sessions et al
as 1:2017cv23160
Defendant:
Juan Acosta, Marc J. Moore, Jeff Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gonzales-Abrahantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Catalan v. Doll et al
as 1:2017cv01427
Petitioner:
Romulo Perez-Catalan
Respondent:
Clair Doll , Jennifer Ritchey , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Menendez-Rodriguez v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv04809
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Menendez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndou v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv03811
Respondent:
Tom Decker , John Kelly , Jefferson Sessions and others
Petitioner:
Laureta Ndou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARPIO RIERA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2017cv00296
Defendant:
JOHN FRANCIS KELLY , THOMAS D. HOMAN , ERIC FARRAR and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN RAFAEL CARPIO RIERA
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
Chen v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv01878
Plaintiff:
Shun Qing Chen
Defendant:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beltran Hernandez v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
Sara Esmeralda Beltran Hernandez
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , John Kelly , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J.E.L.M. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00704
Petitioner:
J.E.L.M. and MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
J.M.V.R. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Petitioner:
J.M.V.R. and ELSA MILAGROS RODRIGUEZ GARCIA
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
