Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Wingfield v. Phelps
as 1:2017cv01159
Petitioner:
Thomas Wingfield
Respondent:
Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Wichita Detention Center et al
as 5:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Jones
Defendant:
Wichita Detention Center, Jeff Easter, Lisa J. Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEEMS v. WINGFIELD et al
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
JIMMY RAY TEEMS
Defendant:
HUGH V WINGFIELD, III, ROSEMARY F PHILLIPS, ANDREW G SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoenig v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 2:2017cv02238
Petitioner:
Ronald M. Hoenig
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Edge, Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marvin Guy v. City of Killeen, Texas, et al
as 16-51433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN L. GUY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS, Texas Civil Service Commission, CHIEF DENNIS BALDWIN, Individual and Official Capacity, JONATHAN R. RINEHART, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Wingfield v. California Correctional Healthcare Services
as 2:2016cv02407
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wingfield
Defendant:
California Correctional Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINGFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01451
Petitioner:
RONALD WINGFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS-BEY v. WOLFF et al
as 2:2016cv03685
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant:
TOM WOLFF, PA SUPERIOR COURT, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Grant et al
as 1:2016cv03866
Plaintiff:
Woodard and Derrick Woodard
Defendant:
Grant, Priscillo Grant, Curtis Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINGFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00794
Petitioner:
RONALD LENWOOD WINGFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
