Cases 61 - 70 of 1,870
Cato v. Pedro et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry Cato, Jr.
Defendant:
O. Pedro, Cori Brown and Kelli J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Brandon Murdock James
Defendant:
Ray Peters, L. Campos, Donald W. Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Central Crime Suppression Unit et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
Central Crime Suppression Unit, Pedro Robles and Buddy E. Rhett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Torres v. Warden
as 2:2023cv08040
Petitioner:
Pedro Torres
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DE LIMA v. ACTING WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv21256
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jovel v. District Attorney's Office
as 4:2023cv03436
Plaintiff:
Pedro Jovel
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HAMLETT et al
as 2:2023cv15723
Plaintiff:
SAHDIEKHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CELESTE HAMLETT, MONICA TYSON, SHALAA CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casilla-Diaz (PS) v. St. Thomas Moore Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
Pedro Casilla-Diaz
Defendant:
St. Thomas Moore Hospital, Keith Minihane and David Baumgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Reardon et al
as 6:2023cv06455
Plaintiff:
Michael Walsh
Defendant:
P. Reardon, D. DebeJan, James Comey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Cantero Bonilla v. X. Lam
as 23-12691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO E. CANTERO BONILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
X. LAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
