Cases 61 - 70 of 243
NEVILLE v. MARTOCIA et al
as 1:2020cv00270
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCIA and BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL STAFF
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. NEVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Sargeant Oldnes, Detention Officer Laston, Detention Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BARTHOLOMEW CO. JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW CO. JAIL, MATT MYERS and D. MEGEL
Plaintiff:
CRAIG TIMOTHY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNICHOLAS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2019cv04640
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD MCNICHOLAS
Defendant:
MATT MYERS, JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE v. MYERS et al
as 3:2019cv00226
Defendant:
MAJOR MARTECIA, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. COLUMBUS INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03986
Defendant:
COLUMBUS INDIANA, MEDICAL STAFF, BARTHOLOMEW CO JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03961
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and GOVERNMENT AGENCY OR OFFICER'S OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY, INDIANA, COURT AND PROSECUTOR
Petitioner:
ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT SUPERVISION OFFENDER SERVICES AGENCY et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
CAROLYN SHELTON, STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, JENNIFER COUNTS-WURIE and others
Plaintiff:
MAHDI M. SHABAZZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
