Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Moulton et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Moulton, Michael Conaway, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Bruton et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Isaac Isahas Washington
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Kenneth Sconyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Dennis Lamar Bruton
as 13-7175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DENNIS LAMAR BRUTON
Kelly v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Abraham Kelly
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Mark Bruton and Cassandra Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derron Jackson v. Officer Bamberg, et al
as 13-11032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER BAMBERG, Georgis State Prison, LARRY BRUTON, Unit Manager, SGT. LT. MOBLEY, Shift Supervisor and others
Bruton v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 0:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bruton
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Owens et al
as 6:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Braja Smith
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Bruce Chatman, Larry Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derron Jackson v. Bamberg
as 6:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Derron Jackson
Defendant:
Bamberg, Larry Bruton, Sgt. Lt. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruton v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv24363
Plaintiff:
Edward Quenton Bruton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
