Cases 61 - 70 of 406
DeJesus v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv01134
Plaintiff:
Jesus DeJesus
Defendant:
Leonta L Jackson, . Morgan, . Harrms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jesus DeJesus
Defendant:
Leonta L. Jackson, Morgan, Harrms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guaderrama v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Christian Guaderrama
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, Brian DeJesus (Star 21207), Evelyn Grube (Star 99267) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jamil Charles Edwards
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Delaware Department of Corrections, Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pease v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 8:2021cv02949
Plaintiff:
Darien Jerode Pease, Sr.
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Johnnie L. Smart and Jen Marie Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Stirling
as 2:2021cv03650
Petitioner:
Manuel Dejesus Solorza Hernandez
Respondent:
Brian P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez-Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00876
Petitioner:
Antonio Dejesus Perez-Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(PC) Bradford v. Watts et al
as 2:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
V. Watts, Delgato, - Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
