Cases 61 - 70 of 4,807
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tulowitzky v. Burley et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Tulowitzky
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, C/O White, C/O Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keefe v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Keefe
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Good Gun v. Driscoll et al
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Chad Sun Good Gun
Defendant:
Jim Driscoll, Tom Kissle, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Scott Patterson
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Brian M. Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
(PC) Rodriquez v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rodriquez
Defendant:
Sacramento County and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Arnott
as 24-4001
Petitioner:
TAYLOR, FKA Gary Taylor Kruitbosch, AKA Nigel Snookeroo McCartney
Respondent:
JIM ARNOTT
Bonilla v. Smiley et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Charles Smiley, Clarence Don Clay, Tim Wagstaffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sigle v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Scott Sigle
Defendant:
Sacramento County and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
