Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Askew v. Asbell et al
as 5:2016ct03159
Plaintiff:
Norman Ben Askew
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Dr. Lands, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID IGE, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON , PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSAINVIL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2016cv02016
Plaintiff:
WEDPENS DORSAINVIL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION , PATRICK NOGAN , CINDY FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cobb v. Perry et al
as 3:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cobb
Defendant:
Frank Perry, George T. Solomon, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Budestean v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Budestean
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbin v. San Diego County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Billy Dee Corbin
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Dept., John Doe 1-100, Jane Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. John Doe 1-100
as 1:2015cv04315
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee King, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. PERRY et al
as 1:2015cv00364
Plaintiff:
STOPPER HORTON
Defendant:
FRANK L. PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, PAULA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
LaShune McCarthy
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, FNU Mortez, FNU Draugn and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
