Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Holly v. Corwin et al
as 4:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Rodrick D. Holly
Defendant:
James Corwin, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grenning v. Klemme et al
as 2:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Neil Grenning
Defendant:
Risa Klemme, Craig D Harrington, Jack Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thelonious Henry v. City of Houston, et al
as 12-20609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THELONIOUS PAUL HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, CITY OF HOUSTON'S FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS CIVIL SERVICE CMSN, HAROLD HURTT, Chief of Police and others
Azzeh v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv07013
Plaintiff:
Shareef Azzeh
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John #1 Doe and John #2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv04239
Plaintiff:
Cedric Arnez Gibson
Defendant:
John I Doe, John 2 Doe and John 3 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Kremen et al
as 2:2012cv01289
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Pete Kremen, Bill Elfo, Wendy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04183
Plaintiff:
David Levi Whitehead
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earton Smith v. Kevin Humphrey, et al
as 12-30629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARTON LYNN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN HUMPHREY, SHANE MCWILLIAMS, RICHARD MCGEE and others
Richard Johnson v. Richard Roe, et al
as 12-40625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROE, Anderson County District Attorney, JOHN 1 DOE, Codefendant attorney and JOHN 2 DOE, Codefendant attorney
Singleton v. Snodgrass et al
as 4:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Singleton
Defendant:
Ron Snodgrass, St. Clair County, John 1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
