Cases 61 - 70 of 2,620
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Derrick M. Morris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
MCCUNE v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. MCCUNE, JR.
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, C.O. MOHNEY, SGT. LESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Myers et al v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers, Michael R Myers, Jr, Caleb Raber and others
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straub v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Todd Straub
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raber v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Caleb Raber
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
