Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Peters v. Langeheine et al
as 3:2013cv01820
Plaintiff:
Brett M. Peters
Defendant:
Langeheine, Hubler, Lan Tiggart and others
Amicu:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Martz v. District Attorney Blair County, et al
as 12-2691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY, DAVID VARANO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
MARTZ v. BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al
as 3:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
SHAWN MARTZ
Respondent:
BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY , BLAIR COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE , DAVID VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martz v. Blair County District Attorney et al
as 3:2012cv00763
Petitioner:
Shawn Martz
Respondent:
Blair County District Attorney, Blair County Probation Office, David Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettis v. Martz et al
as 5:2012cv06025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pettis
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Harrison County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adler v. Harrison County Jail, et al.
as 5:2012cv06020
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Adler
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Harrison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Harrison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2012cv06019
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Wyatt
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Corey Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Harrison County Correction Center et al
as 5:2012cv06018
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Patrick
Defendant:
Harrison County Correction Center, George Martz and Pam Parkhurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Martz, et al
as 11-1467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MARTZ and CORDOVA
Zimmerman v. Jones, et al
as 11-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY RAY ZIMMERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN JONES, MIKE BORGONDO, MR. WRIGHT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
