Cases 61 - 70 of 136
Dunlap v. Greene County Justice Center et al
as 6:2017cv03120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carlton Dunlap, Sr
Defendant:
Greene County Justice Center, Jim Arnott, Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2017cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R Watson
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Stephanie Dorethy, Chris McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robison v. Stokes
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Patricio Francisco Robison
Defendant:
FNU Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Jackson and Patricio Robison
Defendant:
FNU Stokes, FNU Stevenson, FNU Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Blue et al
as 2:2016cv01283
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Fitzgerald Porter
Defendant:
Keven Blue, Drew Perry, Brook Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glen W Robison v. Michael Martel et al
as 2:2016cv08013
Respondent:
Jennifer Barretto and Michael Martel
Petitioner:
Glen W Robison
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Superior Court of Los Angeles
Glen W. Robison v. Superior Court et al
as 2:2015cv09959
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown, Max Huntesman and others
Bivens Six Unknown Agents) Individually In His Capacity As The Secretary Of California Department Of:
Jeffrey Beard
Plaintiff:
Glen W Robison
Robison v. Superior Court et al
as 3:2015cv05865
Plaintiff:
Glen W. Robison
Defendant:
Superior Court, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaudoin v. Hayes et al
as 5:2015cv02848
Plaintiff:
Richie Lee Beaudoin
Defendant:
Kelli Hayes, Robert B Wyche, Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
