Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 755
RIMKA v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv01557
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff: EDWARD RIMKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv01484
Plaintiff: JULIUS WAYNE MILLER
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 3:2018cv00090
Petitioner: Curtis Lee Watson
Respondent: United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Bolster et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00601
Petitioner: Morris J Warren
Respondent: Mark Bolster, J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10849
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00856
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FEIST v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2018cv00156
Petitioner: DAVID FEIST
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUGHES v. BOLSTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00159
Petitioner: JOHN HUGHES, III
Respondent: J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff: MICHAEL COLEMAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00446
Petitioner: MORRIS J. WARREN
Defendant: MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?