Cases 71 - 80 of 692
USA v. Kenneth Whitehead
as 22-1101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH SHABBAZZ WHITEHEAD
WHITEHEAD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITEHEAD v. FORD
as 5:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Snelling, Jr. v. Fulton County Sheriff's Department of Fulton Count, et al
as 21-14508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SNELLING, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF FULTON COUNTY JAIL, WHITEHEAD, Sgt., Fulton Co. Sheriff's Department, WALKER, Major, Fulton Co. Sheriff's Department and others
Mahammend et al v. Galbraiph et al
as 1:2021cv03099
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend and Renardo Whitehead
Defendant:
Daniel Galbraiph, Sgt. Neal, Sgt. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Gregg County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Derik W. Harris
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Department and Donald Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEHEAD v. DE LA CRUZ et al
as 5:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DE LACRUZ, JAY WALKER, SEALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. Mallard et al
as 3:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Canard Herndon
Defendant:
Ofcr. Mallard, Ofcr. Whitehead and Sgt. Emsly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNDON v. MALLARD et al
as 4:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
CANARD HERNDON
Defendant:
MALLARD, WHITEHEAD and EMSLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Nottoway Medical Unit et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Roy Hunt
Defendant:
Nottoway Medical Unit, Armor Correction Health Service, Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
