Cases 71 - 80 of 2,612
Nathan Floyd v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13482
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN C. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Dismukes v. Lockheart et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Bobby T. Dismukes
Defendant:
Shatika Lockheart, Kevin McPhearson, Floyd Spott and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fard Graham v. Michelle Floyd
as 23-1916
Petitioner / Appellant:
FARD RAHMAN GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
BUTLER v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLOYD, LIEUTENANT STAFFORD, JAMES BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Thomas Williams
as 23-7002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HEARING OFFICER THOMAS WILLIAMS and CORPORAL ADEWALE KASSIM
Haywood v. Kolecheck et al
as 2:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Will Haywood
Defendant:
Timothy Kolecheck, Lt Hoff, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Adebayo Adejumo
as 23-6981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. ADEBAYO ADEJUMO, ASSISTANT WARDEN NURUDEEN MATTI and CHIEF OF SECURITY MICHELLE MANN
Floyd Semons v. James Taulbut
as 23-2897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLOYD L. SEMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES TAULBUT
Nagipejutawin v. Floyd County Superior Court, et al
as 23-13223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGIPEJUTAWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FLOYD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Chastain v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2023cv02188
Petitioner:
Floyd M. Chastain
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
