Cases 71 - 80 of 1,023
Hansen v. Knudsen
as 9:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Gary Hansen
Respondent:
Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Ruffin v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Ruffin
Defendant:
Stephanie Sandoval, Chelsea Soto, Justin Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Merchant et al
as 3:2023cv01987
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
David Merchant, Shannon Perkins, Sumter County Emergency Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Bruce Partridge v. State of Minn. Beltrami County, et al
as 23-2092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Partridge
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota Beltrami County, Beltrami County, City of Bemidji and others
Forester-Hoare v. Kind et al
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Kind, Cpt Cushing, Swiekatowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Captain James et al
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Moultrie
Defendant:
Captain James and Officer Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. City of Sumter, S.C. et al
as 3:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
City of Sumter, S.C., David Werchat, Earnest A. Finneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Dalton et al
as 1:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Dalton, Diane Ferguson, Carla Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
