Cases 71 - 80 of 133
IRIZARRY-INGEL v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2014cv04536
Petitioner:
ERIC IRIZARRY-INGEL
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IRIZARRY-INGLES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01013
Petitioner:
ERIC IRIZARRY-INGEL
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irizarry v. United States of America
as 0:2014cv61404
Plaintiff:
Elvin Irizarry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Irizarry-Sanabria v. US
as 14-1413
Petitioner - Appellant:
AMADOR IRIZARRY-SANABRIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
GUZMAN v. CITY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2014cv00650
Plaintiff:
PEDRO GUZMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAFAEL MORERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv06852
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks, Luis Irizarry, Luis More and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Edmond Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOBREGA v. IRIZARRY et al
as 3:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
Domingos Nobrega
Defendant:
Sal Irizarry and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBREGA v. IRIZARRY et al
as 5:2013cv04213
Plaintiff:
DOMINGOS NOBREGA
Defendant:
SAL IRIZARRY and DAVID J. EBBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizarry et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01842
Plaintiff:
Luis Irizarry, Larry Smith, Luis More and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Edmond Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieman v. Lytle et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Nieman, Jr.
Defendant:
Reginald Lytle, Brian Lacrioux, John Gagliardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
