Cases 71 - 80 of 256
Brookshire v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2019cv00125
Petitioner:
Jovan Brookshire and Jovan Michael Brookshire
Respondent:
Warden and FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brookshire v. Warden
as 6:2019cv00025
Petitioner:
Jovan Brookshire and Jovan Michael Brookshire
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ali v. Maryland State's Attorney Office et al
as 8:2019cv00203
Defendant:
Maryland State's Attorney Office, Detective Brett Chavis, Detective Edward McCarty and others
Plaintiff:
Jovan Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hayes v. Sheldon
as 1:2018cv02612
Petitioner:
Jovan D. Hayes
Respondent:
Warden Edward Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. JENKINS et al
as 5:2018cv00217
Defendant:
LANIER, JENKINS, PLYBON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN JOVAN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scolman, Joshua et al v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2018cv00496
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Scolman, Kamau T.Z. Damali, Robert Jay Ward and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker , Jon Litscher, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jovan Battle v. Bruce Faulkner, et al
as 18-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE FAULKNER, The supervisor of field services for NRC, RANDY PFISTER, The Head Warden, JOHN DOE, The field service employee #1 and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY PFISTER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Jovan Battle v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 18-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, NRC Head, Warden, OFFICER ROMANN, 3 to 11 Shift, OFFICER GARDNER, 3 to 11 Shift and others
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
