Cases 71 - 80 of 552
Smith, Deandre v. Eplett, Cheryl
as 3:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Deandre M. Smith
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CULMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
DANIEL J. CULMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Meyers et al
as 3:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Defendant:
Percy Meyers, Sabrina Stevens, Tammy Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Wiggins et al
as 1:2021cv04446
Plaintiff:
Delshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt. Wiggins, Officer Drayton, Sheriff Pat Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Virgil v. Barrett et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Virgil M. Smith
Defendant:
Barrett and Woltgen
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Texas Dept Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2021cv02448
Plaintiff:
Michael G Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept Criminal Justice, The State Of Texas and M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Smith, Jr. v. The People of State of California
as 5:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
The People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gutierres et al
as 1:2021cv06086
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Smith
Defendant:
Jimmy Gutierres, Christopher Gordon and Kevin Viola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2021cv00915
Defendant:
David J Ebbert and Colbert
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. DOC Healthcare Provider
as 1:2021cv00680
Defendant:
DOC Healthcare Provider
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
