Cases 71 - 80 of 2,512
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Neil McGinnis v. James Slayer, et al
as 23-2270
Petitioner / Appellant:
Neil McGinnis
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden James Slayer, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Colby Braun and others
Mahammend v. Neil et al
as 1:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
Neil, Gail Watts and Olds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogden v. Turner et al
as 2:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Kevin Ogden
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, State of New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. Johnson et al
as 0:2023cv02186
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel, David Timmons, Qiana Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mayo v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayo
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Officer Vereen and Neil Burnsteen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. AVALA et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOE NEIL GLENN, JR
Defendant:
AVALA and NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Weaver et al
as 1:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Winfield Walker
Defendant:
Carter Weaver, Shirley Anderson, Neil Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Esequiel Garcia v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 23-15587
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESEQUIEL GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden and RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden
Neil v. Silver et al
as 7:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
Vernon Neil
Defendant:
Doctor Silver, John Doe(s), DR K. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
