Cases 71 - 80 of 140
John Ayers v. J. D. Lozano, et al
as 5:2013cv04428
Plaintiff:
John Ayers
Defendant:
J. D. Lozano, R. Manuel, K. Kostecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pimentel v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv05244
Petitioner:
Joanna Pimentel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Pimentel et al
as 1:2013cv01390
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
R. Pimentel, J.D. Lozano and Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pimentel, et al.
as 1:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
R. Pimentel, J. D. Lozano and S. Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posr v. Ueberbacher
as 13-2707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Posr A. Posr
Defendant - Appellee:
Ueberbacher, Police Officer, Police Department of the City of New York, Raymond Kelly and others
BAKER v. FORD et al
as 3:2013cv02920
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
MELANIE FORD, MELANIE BURAK, MCCLAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pimentel-Munguia v. USA
as 4:2013cv00219
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rafael Pimentel-Munguia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jose Morales v. Robert Horel, et al
as 13-15206
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, SUE RISENHOOVER, GREGORY DUNCAN, Dr. and others
Acuna-Pimentel v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jose De Jesus Acuna-Pimentel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Rodolfo Pimentel-Herrera
as 12-57304
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODOLFO PIMENTEL-HERRERA, AKA Jesus Avina, AKA Juan Herrera Marin, AKA Jesus Herrera Martinez, AKA Manuel Herrera Martinez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
