Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 233
DECKER v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00475
Petitioner: ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rice v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant: Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Rule
as 4:2022cv01179
Petitioner: Kevin White
Respondent: T. Rule and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOFFMAN v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00425
Petitioner: MONTE HOFFMAN
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GALLAGHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff: HOLDEN NICHOLAS GALLAGHER
Defendant: T. RULE, DOMINICK, A. BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Petitioner: EMORY YOUNG
Respondent: S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McGee (ID 113662) v. Rule We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03212
Plaintiff: Antonio Alexander McGee
Defendant: (fnu) Rule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLINKENBEARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00385
Plaintiff: ROBERT JOSEPH DALE CLINKENBEARD
Defendant: T. RULE and AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDENIC v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00373
Petitioner: JOHN BRADY STUDENIC
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
YODER v. KALLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00350
Petitioner: PHILIP J. YODER
Respondent: S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?