Cases 81 - 90 of 12,598
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams, Daniel v. Forman et al
as 0:2024cv60518
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Brenda D. Forman and Office of the Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2024ct03132
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and Lt. Cribbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
Judge Megan Adams, A.G. James Betts, John Edinger, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Moore v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Preston Moore
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Williams, White, Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Church v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Justin Dale Church
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jamison Doeden, Kathryn Halverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
