Cases 81 - 90 of 1,237
Barrett v. Ballard et al
as 9:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
D. Ballard, T. Trombley and S. Snomea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Nikita Barbeau, Jodi Barrett, Sgt Joseph Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciolino v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephen F.P. Ciolino
Defendant:
State of Nevada Ex Rel, NDOC Warden Gittere, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grier, Bobby v. Barrett, Kalvin
as 3:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Bobby Alphonzo Grier
Defendant:
Kalvin Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv06130
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C Barrett
Defendant:
USA, Rodney Myers, S Maat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dzik v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dzik
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Radtke
as 2:2022cv01440
Petitioner:
Carl L Barrett
Respondent:
Warden Dylan Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen Calton v. U.S. Supreme Court, et al
as 22-5298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Justice and others
Dzik v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01982
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dzik
Defendant:
Johnson, Steve Sisolak, Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
