Cases 81 - 90 of 1,024
Whitefield v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitefield and David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sgt. Artis, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linsford Gill v. David Mitchell
as 22-2720
Petitioner / Appellant:
LINSFORD GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
Embrey, Christians, Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 2:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
Embrey, Christians, Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 1:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
C.O. Embrey, C.O. Christians, Sgt. Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazelton v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Rodney Brazelton
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Chris Watkins, Susan Brobston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Vanderschaff et al
as 5:2022cv04046
Plaintiff:
Broderick Blaine Lyons
Defendant:
Tristen Vanderschaff, Jordan Schultz, Lee Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sikes v. Warden, FCI Marianna
as 1:2022cv22880
Plaintiff:
Edward Gill Sikes
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Marianna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC)Kendrix v. Sacramento Main Jail et al
as 2:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Kendrix
Defendant:
Sacramento Main Jail, Tod Gill and Acajella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvin Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12743
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARVIN C. GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
