Cases 81 - 90 of 124
Cremeen v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00721
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, John and Jane Doe, S. Farrow and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Cremeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunn v. Beshear et al
as 5:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Bunn
Defendant:
Steven L. Beshear, LaDonna H. Thompson, Kim Potter-Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Boller et al
as 6:2013cv00393
Defendant:
Pat Armstrong, Jon Boller and Thomas Williams
Plaintiff:
Christopher Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Varano et al
as 1:2013cv02518
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Vincent Mooney, Anthony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAND v. BOLES et al
as 3:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
QUAR'MARDEN Q BRAND
Defendant:
W JOEL BOLES, JOHN R DICKINSON, JEREMIAH MONAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. USA
as 3:2013cv03027
Petitioner:
Thomas William Frederick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pearson v. Williams
as 1:2013cv01988
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pearson
Defendant:
Thomas Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2013cv00755
Petitioner:
Devin Thomas Williams
Respondent:
State Of Florida and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv03154
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
Rhonda Williams, Matt Keane and Kelly Keane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMTER v. C.F.C.F. et al
as 2:2013cv01812
Plaintiff:
JOHN WM. SUMTER
Defendant:
C.F.C.F., CURRAN FROMHOLD -2010 THRU 2012- CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
