Cases 81 - 90 of 1,251
Morton v. Varga et al
as 4:2023cv04117
Plaintiff:
Quintan Morton
Defendant:
John Varga, John Doe 1, East Moline Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANGEL-VARGAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv03879
Petitioner:
RUBEN RANGEL-VARGAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morton v. Varga et al
as 3:2023cv02507
Plaintiff:
Quintan J Morton
Defendant:
John R Varga, John Doe 1, East Moline Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vargas
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gevas v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv50249
Plaintiff:
David Gevas, Michael A. Pierritz, Jr., Jason Colon and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Tarry Williams, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00332
Petitioner:
Jean Carlos Vargas
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harper v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
