Cases 81 - 90 of 6,654
Picozzi v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Defendant:
Frank Dreesen, R. Wood, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1702
Defendant:
T. COBBS, Grievance Coordinator, JEFFREY WHITE, Former Assistant Deputy Warden, DOCTOR FRACIES and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER and JASON ALAN TYRRELL
Fleming v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution et al
as 3:2024cv01105
Defendant:
Eric Goodner, Cortez Sims, John Pollard and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wagoner County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2024cv00249
Defendant:
Ryan Russell, Taryn Mumby, Laci Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shawn Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Card v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv04760
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Daniel Duvernay, Jill Sazama, Amy Watt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. JESTER
as 5:2024cv00264
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv03112
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Fabian D. Woods, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Jester
as 1:2024cv03829
Respondent:
Warden T Jester
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Pendarvis v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6654
Defendant:
RHETT HOLDEN, Agent/employee of SLED, JOHN NEALE, Agent/employee of SLED, JASON WELLS, Captain for SLEDs Narcotics division and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TRENTON PENDARVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
