Cases 1 - 10 of 8,245
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Roshawn J Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00290
Petitioner:
Alchico Grant
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
John Henry Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lucas v. Baird et al
as 5:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lee Lucas
Defendant:
Jake Baird, Lonnie Nail, Vincent Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rose v. Pina et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Defendant:
Alejandro Pina, Heather Christian, Christina Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Frazee et al
as 5:2024cv11465
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Coleman
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Frazee, Jessica R. Cooper, Phyllis McMillen and others
Williams v. Drake et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Drake, Brian Coleman, Mr. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
