Cases 1 - 10 of 483
Brown v. Archer et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Defendant:
Gina Buono, D Archer, RN Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Ladonaven R Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Coronel v. Fernandez
as 2:2024cv02389
Defendant:
R. Fernandez
Plaintiff:
Hank Richard Coronel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Deedra Whitfield, Brandy McMullen, Eric Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brandon Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mottley v. Rock et al
as 3:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Skylar Mottley and Devin Mottley
Defendant:
John Doe, Anthony Jones, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanks v. Greene
as 1:2024cv07553
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Petitioner:
Edward Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coronel v. Fernandez
as 3:2024cv05229
Defendant:
R. Fernandez
Plaintiff:
Hank Richard Coronel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanks v. Conroe City Police et al
as 4:2024cv03004
Defendant:
Detective Derrick Dunn, Montgomery County Sheriffs Dept, Wellpath 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton Todd Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. HANKS et al
as 7:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LAKEITH JACKSON
Defendant:
CHASE L STUDSTILL, GWEN ROBERTSON and DOUG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seibert, Michael v. Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation Department et al
as 1:2024cv22591
Defendant:
G. Drinkwater, J. Garcia, Sgt. Hluchan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Seibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner:
Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent:
State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
