Cases 1 - 10 of 1,034
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mannie v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50160
Plaintiff:
Markus Mannie
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack, Jacob J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv50150
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Lt. McBride, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
LaDarius Cordell Kirkland
Defendant:
William Anderson and Unknown McBride
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Collier
as 24-50274
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
