Cases 1 - 10 of 981
Jordan v. Harpe
as 24-6090
Petitioner:
RAY ROGER JORDAN
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Director and STEVEN HARPE, Director
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallahan v. Rayl et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joesph Hallahan
Defendant:
Kevin Rayl, Justin Bertrand, Johnathan Crow-Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Kelvin Carter
Respondent:
Crystal Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zepeda v. Wexford Health Care Source, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Source, Inc., Christine Brown and Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seal 1 v. USA
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Tyrecus J. Crowe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bangmon v. Tucker
as 24-40122
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lenez Bangmon
Defendant:
Calvin Tucker, senior warden, Christopher L. Norsworthy, Assistant warden, Michael B. Crow, Assistant Warden and others
Williams v. Crowe
as 1:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Cortez D Williams
Respondent:
Crystal Crowe
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett Jr. v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jay Bennett Jr. and Jay Bennett, Jr.
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Christal Crow, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Petitioner:
Giovann Jones
Respondent:
Christel Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
