Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Jason Gowen v. Lieutenant Winfield
as 22-6380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON WAYNE GOWEN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GERALD WINFIELD, #23, SERGEANT PHYLLIS R. FOUCHE, #40, CORPORAL TODD TAYLOR, #88 and others
Defendant:
MAJOR ENOCHS, #9
Harker-Lozada v. Macy's Department Store Loss Prevention et al
as 5:2021cv02922
Defendant:
Joseph Fouche, Holden Layton, Macy's Department Store Loss Prevention and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Harker-Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jurado v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2020cv08602
Defendant:
D. Ernst, A. Fouch, Nicole Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jurado, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Alvarez v. Eaton et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, L. Bird, P. Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Blessett v. Fouch et al
as 2:2019cv01992
Defendant:
J. Quam, A. Fouch, A. Moores and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine La'Mar Blessett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv01223
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
Lieutenant R. Shelton, Captain V Larkin, Officer T. Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. PARKER et al
as 5:2018cv00394
Defendant:
TEECHA DENNIS, LARRY FOUCHE, ERIC PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
IV WILLIAM EUGENE WEST and WILLIAM EUGENE WEST, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv01878
Defendant:
Ronald Davis , Adam Fouch , Annmarie Gary and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Le Mon Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez #147145 v. Encinas et al
as 2:2017cv01825
Defendant:
Unknown Encinas, Ruth Tenierro, Christine M Salas and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Lovitt Zeta Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
