Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCREE v. FLINT et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MCREE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLINT, SARGEANT WALLACE, OFFICER MABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli #954240 v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Defendant:
Nate Stephenson, Andi Wierengo, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli #954240 v. Stevenson
as 1:2023cv00859
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Respondent:
Nate Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons
as 1:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Respondent:
Tracey Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons et al
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Tracey Gibbons, Dale J. Hilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. USA
as 1:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Ware
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. Christian County
as 3:2023cv03206
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee
Defendant:
Christian County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCREE v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MCREE and KEVIN VAUGHN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLINT, SARGEANT WALLACE and ANDREW C. COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mcree v. Flint et al
as 5:2023ct03144
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Mcree and Kevin Vaughn
Defendant:
Captain Flint, Sargeant Wallace and Andrew C. Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
