Cases 1 - 10 of 676
Towns v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02289
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Sherrell C Towns
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Adkins et al
as 1:2024cv13044
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Petitioner:
Willie Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins (ID 91202) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03223
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Cody W. Austin, Tommy L. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Christopher Adkins
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bishop v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02276
Defendant:
Jamie Lee Hume, Felicia Adkins and OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins (ID 91202) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03210
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jennifer Laha, Sarah D. Madgwick and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Woodfin et al
as 5:2024cv01601
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell, George Adams, Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Doty
as 4:2024cv00109
Defendant:
Patricia Doty
Plaintiff:
Steven Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Adkins et al
as 1:2024cv05074
Defendant:
Katharyn Spangler, Racheal Groffsky, Tamela Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins et al v. M.D.O.C. Unit 30 et al
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Larry Moore, Steven Adkins and Webster Collins
Defendant:
Warden Patricia Doty and M.D.O.C. Unit 30
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
