Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Watts v. Clarke County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Clarke County Sheriff Department, Deputy Dices and Deputy Nathanial Wallice
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby-Journey-Egnis v. USA
as 2:2022cv12793
Petitioner:
Albert James Shelby-Journey-Egnis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2020cv00212
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Warden Scott Middlebrooks and Unit Manager D. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Warden Gabiel Walker, Captain Unknown Brown and Warden Scott Middlebrooks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00107
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Warden Scott Middlebrooks and Gabiel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrook et al
as 2:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Warden G. Walker, Warden Scott Middlebrook and MDOC Police or Parole Officers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Giger v. Diaz
as 2:2019cv01052
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Jess Albert James Giger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holston v. USA
as 6:2019cv00281
Petitioner:
Albert James Holston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cave v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2018cv03573
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden
Petitioner:
Albert James Cave, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cave v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2018cv03572
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden
Petitioner:
Albert James Cave, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
