Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Payton v. State of Kansas
as 23-3228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER ALMON PAYTON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
ALMON v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
KIRBY LAMONT ALMON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JOHN P PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Thews et al
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
William Rose, William J Ross and Rose-el
Defendant:
Diane Thews, Nancy Marthakiss, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckley et al v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Steven Buckley and Yolanda Almons
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCants v. Webster et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
Keith R McCants and Keith Rene McCants
Defendant:
Suezanne Webster and Almon
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fairfield Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00211
Petitioner:
Richard H Johnson and Richard H. Johnson
Respondent:
Fairfield Police Department, Austin Almon and Andrew Busscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, et al v. Fairfield Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Richard H Johnson and Shativia L Johnson
Defendant:
Fairfield Police Department, Austin Almon and Andrew Busscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. State of Kansa
as 14-3209
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER ALMON PAYTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Almon v. Dart
as 1:2014cv03129
Plaintiff:
Devon D. Almon
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Werholtz, et al
as 13-3115
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER ALMON PAYTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, FNU LNU, Secretary of Corrections, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
