Cases 1 - 10 of 243
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Robert Barfield
Defendant:
Sheriff Doe, Deputy Sheriff Doe 1-50, All Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornett v. Saul et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Russell Cornett
Defendant:
Roland Saul, Christopher Straud, Brooks Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Barfield
as 3:2023cv03271
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown
Defendant:
. Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023ct03180
Plaintiff:
James T. Sinclair
Defendant:
Officer Rivera, Officer Brothers, Officer Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
Perez and Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STROUD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00235
Defendant:
GARY SCOTT STROUD, RICKY DIXON, AWP K STANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, JAMES SAVGE, DOC DEEZIEN and others
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
