Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Sullivan v. Benson
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Connie Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Dr. Ryzhkova et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Dr. Ryzhkova, Ms. Paden, Ms. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrel F. Braddy v. White et al
as 1:2023cv24378
Plaintiff:
Harrel F. Braddy
Defendant:
Officer D. White, Corporal M. Rodriguez, Officer McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Braddy et al
as 5:2023ct03002
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Doctor Braddy, Wade Walston, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Weeks v. Braddy et al
as 1:2022cv22202
Plaintiff:
Jason Weeks
Defendant:
D. Braddy, V. Hart, Turner Guilford Correction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
USA v. Reginald Braddy
as 22-1926
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGINALD BRADDY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
