Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Escobedo v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Omar Escobedo
Defendant:
Kiera Burgin Gonzales, Sgt. Gresick, Sgt. J. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vazquez-Gonzalez v. Arviza et al
as 1:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Ivan Vazquez-Gonzalez
Defendant:
M. Arviza and B. Burgin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dion Peralta Duran v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dion Peralta Duran
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Burgin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chestnut v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv01349
Plaintiff:
Genard Denez Chestnut
Defendant:
Colin Williams, Robert Brown, Steven Lola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenza Ferebee, Jr. v. C. Manis
as 22-7273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENZA GERALD FEREBEE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MANIS, Wallens Ridge State Prison "Warden", Q. REYNOLDS, Wallens Ridge State Prison Unit Manager, D. ANDERSON and others
Richard Burgin, Jr. v. Steven Marshall, et al
as 22-11829
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD BURGIN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN MARSHALL and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Rubio v. Hensley et al
as 7:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Juan P. Rubio
Defendant:
W.R. Hensley, J.P. Burgin and Warden-W.R.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgin v. Marshall et al
as 5:2021cv00710
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Steven Marshall
Petitioner:
Richard Burgin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holloway et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2020cv04929
Defendant:
The city of New York
Plaintiff:
Saquan Holloway and Erica Burgin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2020cv08066
Defendant:
The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Saquan Holloway and Erica Burgin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
