Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,859
Strobel v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03105
Plaintiff: Nicholas Robert Strobel
Defendant: United States of America, (fnu) Lepe, (fnu) Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pullen v. Centurion Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv00632
Plaintiff: Allen Pullen
Defendant: Centurion Healthcare, T. Bowden and S. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Core Civic
as 3:2024cv00743
Plaintiff: Jamie Bailey
Defendant: Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv01443
Plaintiff: Terell Davison
Defendant: Carothers Bailey, Mark Williams and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner: James Robert Bailey
Respondent: Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deon Bailey v. United States
as 24-2118
Petitioner: Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent: United States of America
Bailey (PS) v. US Probation Office et al
as 1:2024cv01535
Petitioner: Darrel Lamont Bailey and Darrell Lamont Bailey
Respondent: US Probation Office and Governor of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?