Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Phoebus Apollo v. Tracy Beltz, et al
as 23-2659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phoebus P. Apollo, also known as Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacnifisent
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Beltz, Chad Mitsch, Bao Nyguyen and others
Hicks v. Wong et al
as 3:2022cv08663
Plaintiff:
Michael Hicks
Defendant:
Bao Wong, C Galstian, Chief Execution Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shortymacknifisent et al v. Beltz et al
as 0:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent and International Alfred Bilbo Gholson Church of Ministries, Incorporated, The
Defendant:
Tracy Beltz, Dane Swagger, Chad Mitsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reed v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
David M. Mathis, Hank Blank, San Joaquin General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2018ct03272
Defendant:
Maxine M. Chesney, J.C. Holland, Joseph S. Zonno and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang Bao Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nguyen v. Waybourn
as 4:2018cv00662
Petitioner:
Bao-quoc Tran Nguyen
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Long Ho
as 18-56020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LONG BAO HO
Ou-Young v. Federal Medical Center in Butner, North Carolina et al
as 5:2018hc02081
Petitioner:
Kuang Bao Ou-Young
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center in Butner, North Carolina, J.C. Holland and Federal Correctional Complex, Butner, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bao v. Lynch et al
as 6:2016cv06724
Petitioner:
Hua Liu Bao
Respondent:
Lorretta Lynch, Walter M. Ingram, Michael Philips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ngo v. USA
as 2:2016cv00680
Petitioner:
Long Bao Ngo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
