Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Robert L. Berrios v. USA
as 24-1965
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. BERRIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Diaz v. Hendricks et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Omar Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Kristin K. Hendricks, John O'Connor, Erin Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dipre v. Reyes et al
as 1:2023cv22668
Plaintiff:
Pablo Dipre
Defendant:
James Reyes, Daniel Junior, Carmelo Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemus Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Brian Gouff, Kenneth Hardman, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Bailey et al
as 5:2023cv05019
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L. Berrios
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Bailey, Nancy Pryor and Corporal Harwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald et al v. Berrios et al
as 1:2023cv20712
Plaintiff:
Steven Darby McDonald and Yury Picado
Defendant:
Carmelo Berrios, James Reyes, E. Villavicencio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
